We now propose we change the approach, due to present day circumstances.
With no regard to proper sequence of presentation, we will start with a listing
of several preliminary, and to our viewpoint, common sense factors.
1. Approach the problem from the angle that the Act denies to the citizen
HIS Constitutional rights. (Not the D.C.’s)
2. Do so in such a manner that it will cost the I. C. A. (International
Chiropractors Association) very little.
3. Set up an offensive in such a way that, if the medical doctor fights it, he
is fighting the people. (Not the D.C.’s)
4. Approach it in such a way that, if the Basic Science Board fights it, the
Board is fighting the Citizens of the State. (Not the D.C.’s)
5. Arrange it so that a Judge, in making his decision, is going to have to
decide in favor of, or against, thousands of people. (Not just a few
Upper Cervical Doctor! )
Politically—what would you do, if you were the judge? Would you,
in making a decision, say as did one judge, (in effect), “I am not in the
health field, so not being able to know the answers must rely on the honesty
and integrity of eminent that medical doctors.” Would he say if the PEOPLE
were the complainants? Are judges voted into office!?